Difference between revisions of "8.5 - Extended end laps"
From TGN Online
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Where sheet length restrictions mean a double span sheet is not possible, it is possible to provide extended overlaps at the junction of two single span sheets (> 8% of span either side of support) to create an effective double span; Refer to Fig. 8.5a. | Where sheet length restrictions mean a double span sheet is not possible, it is possible to provide extended overlaps at the junction of two single span sheets (> 8% of span either side of support) to create an effective double span; Refer to Fig. 8.5a. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 11: | ||
| − | + | Go to '''[[8.6 - Raking supports and cutting|NEXT]]''' section | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 09:45, 21 March 2017
Where sheet length restrictions mean a double span sheet is not possible, it is possible to provide extended overlaps at the junction of two single span sheets (> 8% of span either side of support) to create an effective double span; Refer to Fig. 8.5a.
Although this is technically suitable as a detail, it is not recommended for practical reasons (ie. less economical, difficult to install, requires more detailed fixing configuration with additional fixings in webs of sheets).
Go to NEXT section
